For obvious reasons, the most enjoyable of our reading assignments in class was by Chuck Klosterman. I believe that it’s because the topic he brings up and criticizes is accessible to me and any other people I can think of. I can fairly safely assume that everyone I know and everyone they know has seen a television show with laugh tracks. Some of my favorite shows, including Friends, uses laugh tracks, and I’ve gotten so used to it, I barely notice the anonymous people laughing along to the show. It does, bother me, however, that there is laughter put in the show to tell me when to laugh. In most cases, too, the laughter I hear does not match the response I would expect from the joke in the script. It is overly loud and rambunctious and not how I would respond. Even when these obnoxious laughs are heard, if I don’t find a joke funny, I don’t laugh at it. Klosterman brings up the point that many shows that don’t use laugh tracks are praised for its absence. Several of these shows are also on my list of things to watch, and even with the absence of strangers laughing in the background, I find myself still laughing when I want to.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Laugh tracks
For obvious reasons, the most enjoyable of our reading assignments in class was by Chuck Klosterman. I believe that it’s because the topic he brings up and criticizes is accessible to me and any other people I can think of. I can fairly safely assume that everyone I know and everyone they know has seen a television show with laugh tracks. Some of my favorite shows, including Friends, uses laugh tracks, and I’ve gotten so used to it, I barely notice the anonymous people laughing along to the show. It does, bother me, however, that there is laughter put in the show to tell me when to laugh. In most cases, too, the laughter I hear does not match the response I would expect from the joke in the script. It is overly loud and rambunctious and not how I would respond. Even when these obnoxious laughs are heard, if I don’t find a joke funny, I don’t laugh at it. Klosterman brings up the point that many shows that don’t use laugh tracks are praised for its absence. Several of these shows are also on my list of things to watch, and even with the absence of strangers laughing in the background, I find myself still laughing when I want to.
Friday, February 18, 2011
topic
For my research paper, I would like to delve into the world of women composers. I want to research who they are, what they've written and why they are so influential. This topic is important in my field of study because I want to go into a career of music, teaching music and maybe performing on the flute. Knowing influential women music composers would be beneficial to me.
When researching, I want to find who the women composers are. I would have to find a database with information on them so that I can narrow down my choices. I can choose the composers who I am most interested in. After narrowing them down, I want to know where they came from, what they've composed and what makes them so successful. Could I learn things that could help me be successful? What made them passionate and gave them a drive for their success? What other important music figures did they influence? How has the woman's role in music and composition changed over the years and when did they first start having roles?
This topic is important to me because I hope to someday be an important music figure as a woman, either teaching or performing or following another musical passion I find. I can find out what makes these women so successful and inspired. They share the same passions as I have: music. And they have become what I aspire to be. I will be very interested in this topic and it will be helpful to me.
When researching, I want to find who the women composers are. I would have to find a database with information on them so that I can narrow down my choices. I can choose the composers who I am most interested in. After narrowing them down, I want to know where they came from, what they've composed and what makes them so successful. Could I learn things that could help me be successful? What made them passionate and gave them a drive for their success? What other important music figures did they influence? How has the woman's role in music and composition changed over the years and when did they first start having roles?
This topic is important to me because I hope to someday be an important music figure as a woman, either teaching or performing or following another musical passion I find. I can find out what makes these women so successful and inspired. They share the same passions as I have: music. And they have become what I aspire to be. I will be very interested in this topic and it will be helpful to me.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Krell annotated bibliography
Krell, John. Kincaidiana. Malibu: Trio Associates, 1973.
John Krell, a member of the flute section of the Philadelphia orchestra and solo piccoloist, studied with renown flutist, William Kincaid. Later, he became a colleague and friend of Kincaid’s. Krell decided to write Kincaidiana to show to flutists around the world what the highlights of Kincaid’s career were. His relationship with the flutist made him credible in the book. The book’s purpose was to inspire flute performers and get them thinking about solving problems of playing the flute. Kincaidiana can be useful for my research because it is one of the most useful books on music and the flute.
John Krell, a member of the flute section of the Philadelphia orchestra and solo piccoloist, studied with renown flutist, William Kincaid. Later, he became a colleague and friend of Kincaid’s. Krell decided to write Kincaidiana to show to flutists around the world what the highlights of Kincaid’s career were. His relationship with the flutist made him credible in the book. The book’s purpose was to inspire flute performers and get them thinking about solving problems of playing the flute. Kincaidiana can be useful for my research because it is one of the most useful books on music and the flute.
Monday, January 31, 2011
About me
Haha I was supposed to write this before my first blog entry. But I will just do it differently from everyone else! I'm Julia, a music education and flute performance major at IUP. Obviously, I love music... a lot. I like any kind of music, but I go through phases in which I listen to different music. Right now I love listening to post-tonal music we're studying in music theory IV. Yes, Britney, I actually like that music! Otherwise I like music the average college student likes. Whatever an average student is. I'm in my sophomore year here in Indiana, but I'm originally from Lancaster, PA. I miss my family and friends there so much but am loving it here too. Over breaks in Lancaster, I find myself getting into old hobbies I don't always have time for here. I usually practice the flute, read, see friends, knit and do yoga. I started making pillows out of shirts that don't fit me anymore; that's probably unusual haha. I also love giraffes, turtles, cats, chocolate, steak, coffee, and the three fish living in my room. Hope you like my blog!
"Attached to technology"
Step one: getting ready to read.
I am now sitting at my desk, getting ready to read the article "Attached to Technology and Paying a Price"... using my computer. I could read it from the class packet, but it will be useful to see how effectively I read while online. Will I be able to focus? I did close the window to Facebook, but I am listening to Bartok on Youtube.
Step two: actually reading.
The first thing I notice about this article online is that it has hyperlinks to other articles or features. I think they distract from the article, which oddly enough, is about distractions. Speaking of which, I am noticing how much technology is around me, which means it is distracting. I am very focused on my phone, even though the article online is short. Noises from technology in other rooms takes my attention and I constantly have to remind myself of where I am in my reading.
Later in reading the article, it makes sense to me that multitasking does not help people retain more information. If multitasking causes people to divide their attention, they're not going to be able to focus on all of what they observe. Information cannot pass from their short-term memory to the long-term, so it is best if they focus their attention more so their efforts are actually effective.
Stephen Yantis, a professor from Johns Hopkins University quoted in the article, stated that since he became more acquainted with technology, he feels an "internal ping" telling him to check his email or phone. I can sympathize with that, since I, too, struggle to turn those thoughts off.
Step three: reflection.
Richtel's article discussed the disadvantages of technology being distracting. I admit, it is very distracting. However, in class today, Matt brought up a good point about that; technology doesn't force us to be distracted. We let technology distract us. For example, I could have put my phone away instead of checking it so often, or I could have turned off the music. I had already signed off of Facebook, which was my way of limiting distraction in the first place. I have already had a lot of experience wasting time on the site while doing homework and decided it was best to focus on my assignment this time.
I have always noticed that times in which technology has been limited to me, I have felt much more peaceful. With my old phone service, I didn't receive service when I came home from school, so winter break was a vacation from the extra stress of my phone. Things seemed a little simpler when texts were not coming my way at all times during the day. Also, my family visits a friend near the Pocono mountains one weekend each summer. During this weekend, we use no phones, no computers and no television. My family spends the time doing crossword puzzles, talking and reading, making the weekend very relaxing.
My goals, after reading Richtel's article and reflecting on my own experiences, are simple. I want to keep up to speed on technological advances, but try my hardest to limit their use in my every-day life. Doing so will keep me less stressed and aware of my actual surroundings: people, nature, old hobbies. I feel healthier when I follow the guidelines of using less technology, so I hope to keep myself from neglecting the most important things in my life. Is it too late to make a new year's resolution?
I am now sitting at my desk, getting ready to read the article "Attached to Technology and Paying a Price"... using my computer. I could read it from the class packet, but it will be useful to see how effectively I read while online. Will I be able to focus? I did close the window to Facebook, but I am listening to Bartok on Youtube.
Step two: actually reading.
The first thing I notice about this article online is that it has hyperlinks to other articles or features. I think they distract from the article, which oddly enough, is about distractions. Speaking of which, I am noticing how much technology is around me, which means it is distracting. I am very focused on my phone, even though the article online is short. Noises from technology in other rooms takes my attention and I constantly have to remind myself of where I am in my reading.
Later in reading the article, it makes sense to me that multitasking does not help people retain more information. If multitasking causes people to divide their attention, they're not going to be able to focus on all of what they observe. Information cannot pass from their short-term memory to the long-term, so it is best if they focus their attention more so their efforts are actually effective.
Stephen Yantis, a professor from Johns Hopkins University quoted in the article, stated that since he became more acquainted with technology, he feels an "internal ping" telling him to check his email or phone. I can sympathize with that, since I, too, struggle to turn those thoughts off.
Step three: reflection.
Richtel's article discussed the disadvantages of technology being distracting. I admit, it is very distracting. However, in class today, Matt brought up a good point about that; technology doesn't force us to be distracted. We let technology distract us. For example, I could have put my phone away instead of checking it so often, or I could have turned off the music. I had already signed off of Facebook, which was my way of limiting distraction in the first place. I have already had a lot of experience wasting time on the site while doing homework and decided it was best to focus on my assignment this time.
I have always noticed that times in which technology has been limited to me, I have felt much more peaceful. With my old phone service, I didn't receive service when I came home from school, so winter break was a vacation from the extra stress of my phone. Things seemed a little simpler when texts were not coming my way at all times during the day. Also, my family visits a friend near the Pocono mountains one weekend each summer. During this weekend, we use no phones, no computers and no television. My family spends the time doing crossword puzzles, talking and reading, making the weekend very relaxing.
My goals, after reading Richtel's article and reflecting on my own experiences, are simple. I want to keep up to speed on technological advances, but try my hardest to limit their use in my every-day life. Doing so will keep me less stressed and aware of my actual surroundings: people, nature, old hobbies. I feel healthier when I follow the guidelines of using less technology, so I hope to keep myself from neglecting the most important things in my life. Is it too late to make a new year's resolution?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)